With the
departure of our police director, Toney Armstrong, I believe it is time for a
conversation on a new meaning for the commonly used term “public safety”.
Generally, this term is used to refer to the presence of police officers or has
some relation to law enforcement. While I believe that law enforcement should
play a major role, I do not believe that the current trends should continue as
they have. Society has changed, morals have evolved and what is socially acceptable
is not what it used to be. Taking those facts into consideration, it is time
for a new, fresh approach that involves the public.
In my
opinion, public safety should be the primary responsibility of the public.
There is a term that has become widely used- “stakeholder”, in reference to
those that should be consulted with when things are about to take place in
communities. That term, while it has the potential to carry much weight, has
been used too loosely and it has not been truly defined.
What is a
stakeholder? Businessdictionary.com defines the term as a person with an interest or concern in something,
especially a business. A stakeholder has ownership, or stake in whatever the
subject is. When we are discussing community stakeholders, they should have a
sense of ownership of the community. Ownership equals the assumption of
responsibility. Anything short of that strips that individual from the right be
called a stakeholder.
Stakeholders
have the responsibility to guide the culture and assist in setting parameters
of what will be tolerated in the community. Stakeholders should rally the
community around those values and see that they are being followed. We have the
awesome responsibility of caring for and developing our environment.
For far too long
we have not assumed the roll of stakeholder and we have reassigned, unfairly,
the duty of setting our culture and parameters of socially accepted behavior to
law enforcement. Law enforcement should be our last option, not our first
choice. The first line of defense MUST BE the stakeholders.
To stakeholders,
this is my position: no longer can violence be a viable option. I challenge
each of you to speak up and calm down conflicts. We know when things are about
to take place. Instead of videoing to share, step in and stop. Use the
influence of your relationships. We have the ability to create our environment.
We determine how safe we will be. Violence can no longer be tolerated and
cannot remain the norm in our communities. Stakeholders must say, “We don’t
behave like this”.
There will be
some that chose not to live within the values that are shared among the
majority of the residents. Some still see violence as a method of expression
and conflict resolution. When reason is ignored, law enforcement should be
deployed. They will enforce the law and, if necessary, remove that individual
for the environment. If law enforcement is the first option, who do you turn to
when individuals no longer respect the authority of the officers? Who is next
in line? By allowing the officers to be the last resort, in cases where that is
possible, you build value in community leadership and true community can be
established. Anything short of that puts us on the verge of seeing a “police
state” as a reasonable solution. Consider this, if the police are being
deployed, in most cases, it’s too late. A crime has already been committed.
Police don’t stop crime. They respond to it. We don’t need more officers, we
need more empowered stakeholders. And, together, we will make the public safe. Public Safety on Display